动态对象感知的SLAM（DOS）利用对象级信息以在动态环境中启用强大的运动估计。现有方法主要集中于识别和排除优化的动态对象。在本文中，我们表明，基于功能的视觉量大系统也可以通过利用两个观察结果来受益于动态铰接式对象的存在：（1）随着时间的推移，铰接对象的每个刚性部分的3D结构保持一致； （2）同一刚性零件上的点遵循相同的运动。特别是，我们提出了Airdos，这是一种动态的对象感知系统，该系统将刚度和运动限制引入模型铰接对象。通过共同优化相机姿势，对象运动和对象3D结构，我们可以纠正摄像头姿势估计，防止跟踪损失，并为动态对象和静态场景生成4D时空图。实验表明，我们的算法改善了在挑战拥挤的城市环境中的视觉大满贯算法的鲁棒性。据我们所知，Airdos是第一个动态对象感知的大满贯系统，该系统表明可以通过合并动态铰接式对象来改善相机姿势估计。

结合同时定位和映射（SLAM）估计和动态场景建模可以高效地在动态环境中获得机器人自主权。机器人路径规划和障碍避免任务依赖于场景中动态对象运动的准确估计。本文介绍了VDO-SLAM，这是一种强大的视觉动态对象感知SLAM系统，用于利用语义信息，使得能够在场景中进行准确的运动估计和跟踪动态刚性物体，而无需任何先前的物体形状或几何模型的知识。所提出的方法识别和跟踪环境中的动态对象和静态结构，并将这些信息集成到统一的SLAM框架中。这导致机器人轨迹的高度准确估计和对象的全部SE（3）运动以及环境的时空地图。该系统能够从对象的SE（3）运动中提取线性速度估计，为复杂的动态环境中的导航提供重要功能。我们展示了所提出的系统对许多真实室内和室外数据集的性能，结果表明了对最先进的算法的一致和实质性的改进。可以使用源代码的开源版本。

Many real-world applications of language models (LMs), such as code autocomplete and writing assistance, involve human-LM interaction, but the main LM benchmarks are non-interactive, where a system produces output without human intervention. To evaluate human-LM interaction, we develop a framework, Human-AI Language-based Interaction Evaluation (H-LINE), that expands non-interactive evaluation along three dimensions, capturing (i) the interactive process, not only the final output; (ii) the first-person subjective experience, not just a third-party assessment; and (iii) notions of preference beyond quality. We then design five tasks ranging from goal-oriented to open-ended to capture different forms of interaction. On four state-of-the-art LMs (three variants of OpenAI's GPT-3 and AI21's J1-Jumbo), we find that non-interactive performance does not always result in better human-LM interaction and that first-person and third-party metrics can diverge, suggesting the importance of examining the nuances of human-LM interaction.

In the past few decades, there has been an explosion in the amount of available data produced from various sources with different topics. The availability of this enormous data necessitates us to adopt effective computational tools to explore the data. This leads to an intense growing interest in the research community to develop computational methods focused on processing this text data. A line of study focused on condensing the text so that we are able to get a higher level of understanding in a shorter time. The two important tasks to do this are keyword extraction and text summarization. In keyword extraction, we are interested in finding the key important words from a text. This makes us familiar with the general topic of a text. In text summarization, we are interested in producing a short-length text which includes important information about the document. The TextRank algorithm, an unsupervised learning method that is an extension of the PageRank (algorithm which is the base algorithm of Google search engine for searching pages and ranking them) has shown its efficacy in large-scale text mining, especially for text summarization and keyword extraction. this algorithm can automatically extract the important parts of a text (keywords or sentences) and declare them as the result. However, this algorithm neglects the semantic similarity between the different parts. In this work, we improved the results of the TextRank algorithm by incorporating the semantic similarity between parts of the text. Aside from keyword extraction and text summarization, we develop a topic clustering algorithm based on our framework which can be used individually or as a part of generating the summary to overcome coverage problems.

The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps.

Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to be able to perform new tasks based on a few demonstrations or natural language instructions. While these capabilities have led to widespread adoption, most LLMs are developed by resource-rich organizations and are frequently kept from the public. As a step towards democratizing this powerful technology, we present BLOOM, a 176B-parameter open-access language model designed and built thanks to a collaboration of hundreds of researchers. BLOOM is a decoder-only Transformer language model that was trained on the ROOTS corpus, a dataset comprising hundreds of sources in 46 natural and 13 programming languages (59 in total). We find that BLOOM achieves competitive performance on a wide variety of benchmarks, with stronger results after undergoing multitask prompted finetuning. To facilitate future research and applications using LLMs, we publicly release our models and code under the Responsible AI License.

DeepMind的游戏理论与多代理团队研究多学科学习的几个方面，从计算近似值到游戏理论中的基本概念，再到在富裕的空间环境中模拟社会困境，并在困难的团队协调任务中培训3-D类人动物。我们小组的一个签名目的是使用DeepMind在DeepMind中提供的资源和专业知识，以深入强化学习来探索复杂环境中的多代理系统，并使用这些基准来提高我们的理解。在这里，我们总结了我们团队的最新工作，并提出了一种分类法，我们认为这重点介绍了多代理研究中许多重要的开放挑战。

对比度学习是视觉表示学习最成功的方法之一，可以通过在学习的表示上共同执行聚类来进一步提高其性能。但是，现有的联合聚类和对比度学习的方法在长尾数据分布上表现不佳，因为多数班级压倒了少数群体的损失，从而阻止了学习有意义的表示形式。由此激励，我们通过适应偏见的对比损失，以避免群集中的少数群体类别的不平衡数据集来开发一种新颖的联合聚类和对比度学习框架。我们表明，我们提出的修改后的对比损失和分歧聚类损失可改善多个数据集和学习任务的性能。源代码可从https://anonymon.4open.science/r/ssl-debiased-clustering获得

在过去的20年中，情感认可受到了计算机视觉社区的极大关注。但是，大多数研究都集中在分析六种基本情绪（例如，喜悦，愤怒，惊喜），其作品有限针对其他情感状态。在本文中，我们解决了感性（强烈的心动或怀旧感），这是一种新的情绪状态，在文献中很少有作品，也没有定义其面部标记的准则。为此，我们首先收集了一个4.9k视频的数据集，该视频的参与者观看了一些感性和非情感广告，然后我们将瞬间贴上了广告中的瞬间。其次，我们使用不同框架的广告级标签和面部动作单元（AUS）激活来定义一些弱帧级感性标签。第三，我们使用AUS激活来训练多层感知器（MLP）以进行感性检测。最后，我们定义了两个新的广告级指标，以评估我们的模型性能。定量和定性结果显示了感性检测的有希望的结果。据我们所知，这是解决感性检测问题的第一项工作。

从积极和未标记的（PU）数据中学习是一种设置，学习者只能访问正面和未标记的样本，而没有关于负面示例的信息。这种PU环境在各种任务中非常重要，例如医学诊断，社交网络分析，金融市场分析和知识基础完成，这些任务也往往本质上是不平衡的，即大多数示例实际上是负面的。但是，大多数现有的PU学习方法仅考虑人工平衡的数据集，目前尚不清楚它们在不平衡和长尾数据分布的现实情况下的表现如何。本文提议通过强大而有效的自我监督预处理来应对这一挑战。但是，培训传统的自我监督学习方法使用高度不平衡的PU分布需要更好的重新重新制定。在本文中，我们提出\ textit {Impulses}，这是\ usewanced {im}平衡\下划线{p} osive \ unesive \ usepline {u} nlabeLed \ underline {l}的统一表示的学习框架{p}。 \下划线{s}削弱了debiase预训练。 Impulses使用大规模无监督学习的通用组合以及对比度损失和额外重新持续的PU损失的一般组合。我们在多个数据集上进行了不同的实验，以表明Impuls能够使先前最新的错误率减半，即使与先前给出的真实先验的方法相比。此外，即使在无关的数据集上进行了预处理，我们的方法也表现出对事先错误指定和卓越性能的鲁棒性。我们预计，这种稳健性和效率将使从业者更容易在其他感兴趣的PU数据集上获得出色的结果。源代码可在\ url {https://github.com/jschweisthal/impulses}中获得